Top ten myths of entrepreneurship and other things to consider

To those of you reading - How did you learn how to swim? A structured lesson plan at the local pool, with a multi year instruction program before you were left to solo - OR - did you jump (or get pushed) into the deep end? How about starting a business? Take years of classes or jump into the deep end?

I jumped into the deep end myself, 20 years ago. Everyone I knew told me not to do it. I never was very good at listening… and now I have three businesses. One of these days I will listen. Scott Shane, as a guest blogger on Guy Kawasaki’s blog wrote a piece title “Top Ten Myths of Entrepreneurship“. I have some opinions of his top ten to share with the three regular readers of this blog.

1. It takes a lot of money to start a new business: Scott says no, $25,000 average. I agree! My business ventures’ startup capital was (in order) $35,000, $15,000, $0, $11,000, $2000, $45,000 and $100,000. Ironically the most expensive one is the least successful so far. Or maybe too much startup money is to blame.

2. Venture Capitalists are a good place to go for startup money: Scott says no. I could never get one to return my calls, so I don’t know either.

3. Most business angels are rich: Scott says no. My only business angel was my mother. She is not rich.

4. Start-ups can’t be financed with debt: Scott says yes they can. My own experience would be (in order) angel investor, cash, home equity loan. Banks didn’t finance the business per se, but they did let me put the house on the hook.

5. Banks don’t lend money to start-ups: Scott says yes. I say yes too; in the beginning it was home equity, now they love me and can’t give me enough money. At 9%, the criminals.

6. Most entrepreneurs start businesses in attractive industries: Scott says no. I haven’t done so, apparently my experience is different than most. For the life of me I could never see the attraction of owning a restaurant or bar. Racetrack maybe… but my most successful business experiences are with the ones that can scale.

7. The growth of a start-up depends more on an entrepreneur’s talent than on the business he chooses: Scott says no, get into computers. I say no, think about scale. Computer businesses typically DO scale well, but they are not the only ones. Any franchised system is a scaling system (own the franchisor, don’t be a franchisee). My more successful projects have been the ones that scaled up easier. Some things like restaurants and hotels (Scott’s examples) won’t scale easily because they require buildings and big capital.

8. Most entrepreneurs are successful financially: Scott says no. I say that I have never met a successful business person that complains about having too much money. They are all broke, just ask them! It is a learned response, since any time you tell people that you are doing well, they stick their hand out for some money. If you read “The Millionaire Next Door” you will find out that the rich are mostly self-employed and drive Chevrolets. They are wealthy, they just don’t look it. I look like a homeless bum most of the time. According to my banker, most of his successful clients do too.

9. Many start-ups achieve the sales growth projections that equity investors are looking for: Scott says no. I say, ask an academic. According to Scott’s numbers one of my companies will make the top 2% of sales. Not good enough for a venture capitalist, but not bad for a self-funded effort. Go me! Of course the others won’t, so I must suck.

10. Starting a business is easy: Scott says no. I say yes. Starting IS easy, succeeding less easy. Sometimes you have to be smart enough to kill it, so that you can start another. If you noticed I listed the finances for seven start-ups, but now I have only three. Four are dead by my hand. You only have so many hours in a day, so put your time into the best projects.

Fun gifts for her

Hey I know what to get my woman chick beeyotch partner! My PENIS in a BOX. Wow! Just when you thought that the SNL video featuring Justin Timberlake was too far out there, some company has decided to actually sells Dicks in Boxes. Really

Dick in the box

Aprilia creates new object of lust: RSV-4 Superbike

Aprilia has come out with more reasons to believe that Italian engineers know more about sex than all the Japanese engineers in the world. Behold the Aprilia RSV-4 the new Superbike.

Press Release
The Aprilia RSV 4 “Race Machine” is unveiled for the first time.

The Aprilia Superbike, the bike which from 2009 will bring the Noale based company back to four-stroke racing, has been unveiled for the first time during the Piaggio Group Convention in Milan.

After the success in the 2007 World Championships with Aprilia riders and bikes dominating the 125 and 250 classes (winning all four titles, a repeat of the 2006 performance), the Veneto company gave a preview of the eagerly awaited RSV 4 “Race Machine”.

An extraordinary preview to a privileged audience of more than 1,200 dealers attending the International Piaggio Group Convention.

Four cylinders, 1000 cc, power of well over 200 HP in the race version, the new bike due to make its road debut by the end of 2008 will mark Aprilia’s return to the World Superbike Championship in the 2009 season.

The Aprilia RSV 4 is driven by the most revolutionary and powerful engine ever built by Aprilia. A four-cylinder one litre 65¯ V engine - a layout making it unique among all the world’s production engines - in which the most sophisticated engine engineering is combined with top quality materials and the most advanced electronic control technology.

The Aprilia engine in fact uses integral ride-by-wire technology, opening up new frontiers in managing such a powerful engine, with almost infinite possibilities for controlling power output and traction.

Aprilia.com

Nader announces his presidential candidacy; Democrats hire hit men to save election

In a move that shows how clueless he is to the voter base he appeals to, Ralph Nader has announced his candidacy for president. Because he has a chance, just like every other American kid. Yeah right.

In other news, the Democratic National convention has posted a “Wet Work” job on their website, seeking people to remove political obstacles from the planet. We do not have confirmation that these events are related.

Technorati Tags: , ,

The game of “Diaper Chicken”

Diaper Chicken is a little game you play between spouses, using a baby as the prop. The game is played by holding the baby until a smell is noticed. The key strategy is to ignore the smell until it is possible to hand the baby to the other player, while simultaneously making a seemingly legitimate excuse for why you must leave the room immediately – or preferably the house. The game is won if you can successfully pass the baby off with a dirty diaper and force the opposing player to change the diaper. Extra points can be earned if the opposing player figures out that you have done this smelly handoff intentionally. No points are earned if a visiting relative is convinced to change the diaper in lieu of the handed off spouse.

Today my wife managed to come into my home office with our baby, pass him off without breaking stride and scamper off to have a shower. She won – it took about 5 seconds for me to realize that the child was foul, and as I followed her path down the hall to give the child back, I realized that she had already made it into the shower. She must have run down the hallway. Evil, evil woman.

I cornered her when she got out of the shower, and the big grin on her face was proof enough to me that the baby’s accident was no accident. For any of you expecting your first child, be aware of this game. It WILL happen to you. If you are already a parent, then you know that it HAS happened to you.

To avoid playing this game, invest in one of these or use these When discussing your loss at playing the game, use these so that the children do not come to understand the incredibly fun game you are playing.

A collection of ugly Cadillacs

I have always wondered about people’s aesthetic tastes. Now I have more evidence for that wonder - witness the largest collection of ugly Cadillacs the world has ever seen.

I am astounded by the appearance of these things.

wow. Uglee

Neat things for the techie in you - kinematic models

This is a neat (but poorly laid out) site that has all sorts of cool engineering mechanisms that are CAD modelled, animated or actual videos of models. Very cool stuff from Cornell.

“KMODDL is a collection of mechanical models and related resources for teaching the principles of kinematics–the geometry of pure motion. The core of KMODDL is the Reuleaux Collection of Mechanisms and Machines, an important collection of 19th-century machine elements held by Cornell’s Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.”

Kinematic Models

Bad T-shirts, in a good way

Have you ever wanted to do something, but were held back by considering what your mother would think? Apparently these people don’t have mothers…. T-Shirt Hell

http://www.webmasterworld.com/

Webmaster World is a damn good site. I have been lurking, reading, posting and pondering there for 5 years now. Seems like it is not that long, but I guess i am getting old. At first I was highly annoyed at the insistence on anonymity. For example, when discussing a site problem, you must use a generic name like widget.com to describe the site.

It seemed stupid at first, but then I started poking around at other webmaster sites and found them cluttered with way too much spam and self promoting url-drops. Very annoying and then I understood the point of “widget .com” . So go there and learn - and read the charter so that you don’t get smacked too often

Webmaster World

Micro-Hoo. This will never work

I have no idea what kind of crack these people are smoking, but this merger/aquisition will never work. Two BIG companies with two BIG cultures and they are going to duct tape them together and magically take on Google. Would you like to buy a bridge while you are at it? Lightly used, vintage construction in the NY area. Reasonable price, OBO….

Bill must have done a little bit more dope in Harvard than he lets on. Does anyone remember TIME/AOL? Or how about almost ANY merger. They don’t work. They work on paper, but companies are not plans on paper. They are humans, with egos, and power trips and defense of turf and posturing at the water cooler and every other stupid thing that we all do. Put two different cultures together and get a pile of crap. No synergies, just wasted money.